Where ProcessWeave fits
Not an industry. A shape. If your process looks like this, we are worth a conversation.
The shape of a process that fits
- It crosses more than one system of record — typically an ERP plus mail, documents or a database.
- It involves human judgement at defined points, not just at the end.
- It runs for days or weeks, not seconds.
- Somebody will eventually ask who approved what, and why.
- Today it is held together by email, a spreadsheet and re-keying.
Four processes that fit
A claim arrives by email with documents attached. Fields are extracted and validated against the ERP, serial and invoice are checked against each other, two levels of approval sign off, and the return, the credit note and the stock movement are all written back. Weeks of elapsed time, a dozen systems touched, and a question at the end about who authorised the credit.
Orders arrive through several doors and stop for a reason — credit, pricing, compliance, stock. Each hold routes to the team that owns it with the context attached, ages visibly while it waits, and releases with the reason recorded.
An invoice is read, matched, and routed by value and cost centre. Approvers see what they need and nothing else. The bank file is produced, the posting is made, and the trail supports the audit without anyone assembling it afterwards.
Documents are collected and machine-read, checks run against external registries, credit and compliance approve in sequence, and the account is created in the ERP — with every document, check and decision retained against the record.
Where it does not fit
If you need to move a million rows between two databases every hour, use a data pipeline. If your process is entirely inside one system, that system’s own workflow engine will be cheaper and better. If nobody ever needs to know who approved what, our main advantage is wasted on you. And if you want a SaaS product you can swipe a card for, we are not that — ProcessWeave is installed, and the first conversation is with an engineer.